Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

State of the language: Phonology

  • Feb. 16th, 2006 at 4:05 PM
Polar Bear
My phonology section was due today as part of my independent study. So, with the deadine, I actually to decide.


Here is the IPA stuff for my language:

Vowels
[Vowel Grid]
Front: [i, æ]
Central: [ə]
Back: [u, o, ɑ].

Look at the italics for the equivalent way to say each sound.
[i] = beat or each.
[æ] = fat, pat.
[ə] = blood, about.
[u] = boot, gooey.
[o] = Go, Ohio.
[ɑ] = hot, spa.


Consonants
[Consonant Grid]

Plosives/Stops: [p, t, k]
Nasals: [m, n, ŋ]
Trills: [ʙ, r]
Fricatives: [f, s]
Approximant: [j]
Lateral Approximant: [ʎ]

Most of those are just like the equivalent letters in English, so I'm not going to give examples of them all... but not all are so straight forward.

[ŋ] = The "ng" sound in sing.
[ʙ] = No English equivalency. The closest is the "brrr" sound. Think of this as a trilled "r" and a "b" at the same time.
[r] = Trilled r. I can't think of a good example for this.
[j] = The "y" sound in you or yesterday.
[ʎ] = The "lli" sound in million.

For real fun, you may want to compare this to the original phonology I came up with. Also, these are still set to change- especially because I haven't really made many words in my language yet. This phonology may prove to be not very usable for whatever reason- and I might be forced to add or delete sounds until I can get something that works. Basically, as the language develops, so will the phonology. As I was telling my linguistics professor today, it's a start for the language. A fairly "simple" phonology- 6 vowels and 12 consonants (compared to the 15+ vowels in English and... uhh.. probably more than 15 consonants, as well).

Tags:

Comments

[info]s0rr0w wrote:
Feb. 16th, 2006 11:43 pm (UTC)
I... I'm supposed to learn all of this? Oh my.
[info]aberwak wrote:
Feb. 17th, 2006 02:27 pm (UTC)
Of course! Bwahahaha. Oh, what I mean to say is... of course! Bwahahaha.
[info]foxfour wrote:
Feb. 27th, 2006 07:18 pm (UTC)
got here from [info]conlangs. some suggestions: this is a phoneme inventory, not a phonology; you have no description of how these phonemes are realized. if you want elaboration, i'd be glad to give it, but i'm in a rush at the moment. also, prosody and such would be worth describing.
[info]aberwak wrote:
Feb. 27th, 2006 07:31 pm (UTC)
Thank you for the correction! I am new to conlangs and even linguistics in general (have only had one basic course), so a lot of the terminology can be confusing. An elaboration would be wonderful. After all, that is why I'm doing this- to learn. Thanks for your help!
[info]foxfour wrote:
Feb. 27th, 2006 08:03 pm (UTC)
ok, i've put some elaboration below.
[info]foxfour wrote:
Feb. 27th, 2006 07:59 pm (UTC)
a phoneme inventory is part of a phonology, but a full phonology should also describe how those sounds actually are realized; for example, in english, we have two sounds, [p] and [ph], which are both realizations ("allophones") of the phoneme /p/. they never occur in the same environments, and so are said to be in "complementary distribution": there's a [ph] at the start of a stressed syllable, and [p] everywhere else (roughly — there are some subtleties to the distribution.)

so, in a description of a phonology, one should also describe how the sounds actually occur. you can go to various levels of detail (are the [t]-like sounds laminal dentals, apical alveolars, apical post-alveolars, or what?) but that's probably not necessary here.

prosody is things relating to stress, pitch and tone. the language might not use any of these extensively, but it'll always have them to some degree; see turkish for an example of a language with almost no stress, and mandarin for a language with extensive use of contour tone.
[info]foxfour wrote:
Feb. 27th, 2006 08:09 pm (UTC)
and phonotactics! how could i forget.

phonotactics describe what syllables are allowable in the language. languages differ extensively on this. english syllables can be of the form:
s (C) (approximant) V (C) (C) (C)
more or less. japanese syllables, on the other hand, can only be
(C) (j) V (n)
more or less. phonotactics are generally harder to describe than as a simple regular expression, as i've tried to frame them above, but can be generalized that way.

one important thing to remember is that syllables almost always form around a sonority peak; if you don't know what sonority is, please look it up. it's basically how "vowel-like" a given segment is. syllables tend to go from low-sonority to a high-point at the vowel, then down again, until you get to the next syllable.

Profile

Polar Bear
[info]aberwak
Scott, aka Frodo, aka Scooby, aka Ketchup
StrangeGravity

Advertisement

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Keri Maijala